Speak for Sociology

Promoting sociology and sociology research

ASA Press Release: Children in U.S., Great Britain Share Risk Factors for Behavioral Problems

May 16th, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC, May 16, 2012 — Children in the United States and Great Britain share a number of common risk factors that increase the likelihood that they will have behavioral problems—and Britain’s broader social welfare programs don’t appear to mitigate those risks, according to a new study in the June issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior (JHSB).

The researchers—from North Carolina State University, California State University-Northridge, and the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign—evaluated data from a 1994 study of children between the ages of five and 13 in the U.S. and a 1991 study of children in the same age range from England, Scotland, and Wales.

In both the U.S. and Great Britain, the JHSB study found that male children, children with health problems, and children with divorced mothers were more likely to have behavioral problems.

“We also found that stronger home environments—those that are intellectually stimulating, nurturing, and physically safe—decrease the likelihood of behavior problems in both the U.S. and Great Britain,” said Dr. Toby Parcel, a professor of sociology at NC State and lead author of the JHSB study.

“We wanted to see whether the role of parents was equally important in both societies because the argument has been made that more developed welfare states—such as Great Britain—can make the role of parents less important, by providing additional supports that can help compensate for situations where households have more limited resources. This study tells us that parents are important in households, regardless of the strength of the welfare state.”

While there were common risk factors for children in the U.S. and Great Britain, there were also some differences between these groups. For example, “family structure” effects were more pronounced in Great Britain. Family structure, in this context, refers to marital status and family size. In Great Britain, a child from a family with a single mother or multiple children was at a higher risk of having behavioral problems.

Additionally, the more children in a British family, the greater the likelihood a child from that family had behavioral problems. These effects were absent in the U.S.

Titled, “Children’s Behavior Problems in the United States and Great Britain,” the study was co-authored by Dr. Lori Ann Campbell, of Cal State-Northridge, and Dr. Wenxuan Zhong, of University of Illinois, and was funded, in part, by the National Science Foundation.

The researchers are now looking to see how shared risk factors may influence child cognition and academic achievement across these two societies. Parcel and Campbell have previously shown that parents are critical to the creation of strong home environments in both the U.S. and Great Britain.

 ###

About the American Sociological Association and the Journal of Health and Social Behavior

The American Sociological Association (www.asanet.org), founded in 1905, is a non-profit membership association dedicated to serving sociologists in their work, advancing sociology as a science and profession, and promoting the contributions to and use of sociology by society. The Journal of Health and Social Behavior is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal of the ASA.

The research article described above is available by request for members of the media. For a copy of the full study, contact Daniel Fowler, ASA’s Media Relations and Public Affairs Officer, at (202) 527-7885 or pubinfo@asanet.org.

For more information about the study, members of the media can also contact Matt Shipman, NC State News Services, at (919) 515-6386 or matt_shipman@ncsu.edu.

Tags: ,

ASA Press Release: ASA Executive Officer Criticizes House Effort to Cut Census Bureau Funding

May 15th, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC, May 15, 2012 — American Sociological Association (ASA) Executive Officer Sally T. Hillsman, PhD, criticized the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday for passing a bill last week that would cut funding to the U.S. Census Bureau and result in the elimination of several important Census Bureau programs. Sociologists are among the primary users of census data in their roles as applied researchers as well as scholars.

“The House of Representatives’ recent attempt to cut Census Bureau funding, which would abolish the American Community Survey and potentially eliminate the 2012 Economic Census, is extremely shortsighted,” said Hillsman.

On May 10, the House passed its version of the FY 2013 Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations bill (H.R. 5326), which funds the Census Bureau and other federal agencies. According to Census Bureau Director Robert Groves, the House bill would force cancellation of the 2012 Economic Census which measures the health of the U.S. economy. In addition, the bill would abolish the American Community Survey, the only source of objective, consistent, and comprehensive information about the nation’s social, economic, and demographic characteristics down to the neighborhood level. The House bill would also prevent the Census Bureau from developing and implementing innovative, cost saving strategies and tools for conducting the next decennial census in 2020.

“The House bill would devastate the ability of U.S. cities and communities to receive critical information about their economies and social demographics that they need to make informed, effective decisions,” Hillsman said. “As the Senate drafts its version of the legislation, it should ensure that the Census Bureau is fully funded and that the Economic Census, the American Community Survey, and the 2020 Census efforts are unscathed. To do anything less would adversely affect our nation’s social and economic future.”

Great Summary on Importance of House’s CJS Bill

May 14th, 2012

Here is a great summary from AAAS of the House’s recent vote on the CJS Appropriations bill. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/05/house-takes-pot-shots-at-research.html?ref=em#.T7ES0PpV0bc.email

The Senate will now consider its version of the CJS funding bill by Memorial Day.

Tags: ,

House Eliminates Polical Science Program Funding at NSF

May 10th, 2012

The House of Representatives continued work on the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill yesterday.

Late last night the House voted 218-208 (5 Dems voted yes; 26 Repubs voted no) to prohibit NSF from spending appropriated funds on the political science program.   The debate was lackluster.  Representative Flake (R-AZ) made fun of some grants, claimed Harvard and Yale political science departments didn’t need federal funds since they had huge endowments, and talked about the need to reduce the debt.   Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-SC), who spent most of the day trying to refute most of the Republican amendments, responded with some of the material that COSSA and NSF sent up.

Other amendments voted by the House last night included

  • H AMDT .1058 from Rep. Flake  (R-AZ) – To reduce funding by $1.2 billion to the Research and Related Activities account of NSF.  The amendment failed 121 – 291. 121 Republicans voted for the amendment.  179 Democrats voted against along with 112 Republicans.
  • H AMDT .1088 from Rep. Cravaack (R-MN) – To prohibit funds to be used to carry out the activities of the Climate Change Education Program at NSF.  The amendment passed 238 – 188. 230 Republicans voted for the amendment along with 8 Democrats.  178 Democrats voted against along with 10 Republicans.

Tags: ,

Amendment to NSF Funding Bill Would Eliminate Political Science Research Programs

May 9th, 2012

Rep. Flake is planning to introduce an amendment to prohibit funds from being used for the National Science Foundation Political Science Program.  Sources say the amendment does not cut any funding for the NSF and says it would likely result in more funding going to natural science research at the NSF.

The Political Science program has $11 million.  This is a pretty small amount to split with among the other sciences. It has conducted important research on democratization, radicalization and terrorism, the notion of the commons (which won Elinor Ostrom a Nobel Prize), disaster response, and voting behavior. There has been a political science program at NSF for over 30 years.  The NSF-supported political science research uses the same scientific, data-driven approaches of all the other sciences.

Tags:

Census Bureau Funding Update

May 9th, 2012

Here’s a quick update on the status of funding for the Census Bureau in the FY13 Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill (H.R. 5326).

Yesterday (Tuesday), the House approved an amendment offered by Rep. Lynch (D-MA) to shift $4 million from Periodic Censuses account to state/local law enforcement assistance programs in Justice Department, by voice vote.

But it DEFEATED, on a recorded vote (190 – 218), the Michaud (D-ME) amendment to shift $38 million from Periodic Censuses to EDA.  Good work, team!

Next up are direct attacks on the ACS.  They will come in the form of “limiting” amendments (i.e. how funds can/can’t be spent) at the end of the bill, which could be today or tomorrow.  The amendments to prohibit the expenditure of funds for Census or Justice to enforce sec. 221 of Title 13 (the Census Act) with respect to the ACS WOULD, in fact, have the effect of making response to the ACS voluntary, despite what you might hear from proponents.  That section is the one that provides for penalties for non-response for both the decennial census and, therefore, the ACS.  If you can’t tell respondents they are required by law to respond, then the survey becomes voluntary.

NOTE: There also are amendments to ELIMINATE ALL FUNDING FOR THE ACS.  Remember, roughly $450 billion/year in federal program funds are allocated to state or local governments based on ACS data.  To make the case to specific members of Congress who might be on the fence (as ridiculous as these amendments might seem), go to the recent Brookings Institution report to see the allocations by program and state.  <http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2010/0726_acs_reamer.aspx>

Privacy Policy | RSS Feeds | Copyright © American Sociological Association

American Sociological Association
1430 K Street, NW - Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: FAX: (202) 638-0882 TDD:  (202) 638- 0981 

Website Design | Web Content Management

Powered by WordPress

Blossom Theme by RoseCityGardens.com